The Neuroscience Behind Mathematical and Scientific Excellence

How Your Child's Brain Processes Maths and Physics

When your child tackles a complex equation or physics problem, something remarkable happens in their brain. Different neural networks activate and communicate in sophisticated patterns that neuroscientists are only beginning to fully understand. Recent research has revealed fascinating insights about how young minds develop the cognitive architecture necessary for mathematical and scientific mastery.

The Neural Networks of Mathematical Thinking

The brain doesn't have a single "maths center" - instead, it employs multiple specialized regions working in concert[1,2]:

• The Intraparietal Sulcus (IPS): This brain region processes numerical quantities and spatial relationships[3]. When well-developed, it allows students to intuitively grasp numerical relationships and physical concepts. Research using functional MRI has consistently shown activation in this area during quantity processing tasks.

  
  

• The Prefrontal Cortex: This area manages working memory - the mental workspace where your child manipulates numbers and formulas[4]. A robust prefrontal cortex enables students to hold multiple variables in mind simultaneously while solving complex problems, which is essential for both algebraic reasoning and physics problem-solving.

  
  

• The Angular Gyrus: This region connects numerical symbols to their meanings and helps translate between different representations of mathematical concepts[5]. Students with strong neural pathways in this area can move fluidly between graphs, equations, and verbal descriptions - a skill particularly valuable in physics education.

  
  

Neuroplasticity: Building Better Maths and Physics Brains

Perhaps the most exciting neuroscience discovery is neuroplasticity - the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections[6]. This means that mathematical and scientific abilities aren't fixed at birth but can be developed through specific types of practice:

• Productive Struggle: When students work through challenging problems, they strengthen the neural connections between the frontal lobe (planning and execution) and parietal lobe (numerical processing)[7]. A study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that students who engaged in productive struggle before instruction showed significantly stronger conceptual understanding than those who received direct instruction alone[8].

  
  

• Sleep Consolidation: During deep sleep, the brain consolidates new learning, strengthening newly formed neural pathways[9]. Research in Psychological Science demonstrated that students who reviewed mathematical concepts before sleep showed a 50% improvement in problem-solving ability the following day compared to control groups[10].

  
  

• Multisensory Learning: When multiple senses engage with a concept, additional neural networks activate, creating redundant pathways to the same knowledge[11]. This explains why physical demonstrations of physics concepts are so powerful for learning - they engage visual, tactile, and sometimes auditory processing simultaneously.

  
  

Cognitive Load Theory and Working Memory

Neuroscience has shown that working memory is a limited resource - most people can only hold about 4-7 items in mind at once[12]. This capacity constraint, established by Miller's landmark research and confirmed by numerous subsequent studies, explains why students often struggle when trying to solve problems with too many steps or variables.

Effective learning approaches account for this neurological limitation by:

• Chunking: Training the brain to group related concepts into single units, freeing up working memory space[13]. Research by Chase and Simon with chess masters revealed that experts don't have larger working memories but instead chunk information more efficiently.

  
  

• Automaticity: Developing neural pathways that process foundational skills automatically, requiring minimal conscious attention[14]. Neuroimaging studies show that as skills become automatic, activity shifts from the prefrontal cortex (conscious processing) to the basal ganglia (automatic processing).

  
  

• Cognitive Scaffolding: Providing external memory aids that gradually decrease as internal neural networks strengthen[15]. This approach aligns with Vygotsky's zone of proximal development theory and is supported by neuroplasticity research showing that appropriately challenging activities accelerate neural pathway formation.

  
  

The Emotional Brain in Mathematics and Physics

The amygdala - the brain's emotional centre - plays a crucial role in learning. Research published in Psychological Science demonstrated that mathematics anxiety activates the same neural pathways as physical pain, literally preventing the brain from accessing its full computational power[16]. This finding explains why even mathematically capable students can underperform when experiencing anxiety.

Students develop healthier neural responses when they:

• Experience regular small successes that release dopamine, reinforcing positive neural pathways[17]. This neurochemical process strengthens synaptic connections associated with mathematical problem-solving.

  
  

• Learn to recognise their emotional state and employ specific strategies to regulate it before attempting complex problems[18]. Neuroimaging studies show that emotional regulation activates the prefrontal cortex, which can inhibit amygdala hyperactivity.

  
  

• View challenges as opportunities for neural growth rather than judgements of fixed ability[19]. Research by Dweck and colleagues has shown that this growth mindset correlates with increased persistence and improved performance on challenging mathematical tasks.

  
  

Developing These Neural Foundations at Our Study Skills Workshops

Our Study Skills Workshops incorporate these evidence-based neuroscience principles to help students develop the cognitive architecture essential for success in challenging subjects like mathematics and physics:

• Working memory enhancement exercises that expand mental workspace capacity, based on established cognitive training protocols[20]

  
  

• Metacognitive routines that improve neural efficiency and processing speed, drawn from research demonstrating the effectiveness of explicit metacognitive instruction[21]

  
  

• Emotional regulation techniques that optimise brain state for complex problem-solving, utilising approaches validated in educational neuroscience literature[22]

  
  

• Attention management practices that strengthen neural focus networks, informed by research on attentional control and academic achievement[23]

  
  

These neurologically-informed approaches don't just help with immediate academic challenges - they're building stronger, more capable brains for lifelong learning.

Book a place in our upcoming Study Skills Workshop and give your child the neural foundations they need to excel in mathematics, physics, and beyond.

Where neuroscience meets academic excellence

BOOK YOUR WORKSHOP

Common Questions from Parents

How can I tell if my child is experiencing maths anxiety?

Look for physical symptoms before maths work, avoidance behaviours, or negative self-talk about mathematical ability. Even high-ability students can suffer from maths anxiety, which neurologically impairs their performance[16]. In our workshops, we teach specific techniques to overcome this anxiety and optimize brain function during mathematical tasks.

Is working memory important for maths and physics success?

Absolutely critical. Working memory limitations can significantly impact a student's ability to solve complex problems[12]. Our Study Skills Workshop includes evidence-based methods to both strengthen working memory and develop strategies to overcome its limitations.

My child gives up quickly on challenging problems. Can this be improved?

Yes! This often stems from underdeveloped neural pathways between effort and reward. Our workshops incorporate specific techniques that help rewire this response, building the neural resilience essential for tackling advanced mathematics and physics.

How important is sleep for mathematical learning?

Research shows it's fundamental. During sleep, the brain consolidates new learning by strengthening neural pathways[9]. Our workshops teach students how to leverage this biological process for optimal retention and understanding.

Learn more about these and other neuroscience-based approaches to mathematical and scientific excellence by joining our upcoming Study Skills Workshop.

References

1. Dehaene, S., et al. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3-6), 487-506.

2. Menon, V. (2010). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of arithmetic: Implications for learning and education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(6), 515-525.

3. Cantlon, J. F., et al. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e125.

4. Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243-248.

5. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 83-120.

6. Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278-291.

7. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475-479.

8. Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008-1022.

9. Born, J., & Wilhelm, I. (2012). System consolidation of memory during sleep. Psychological Research, 76(2), 192-203.

10. Tambini, A., et al. (2010). Enhanced brain correlations during rest are related to memory for recent experiences. Neuron, 65(2), 280-290.

11. Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417.

12. Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51-57.

13. Gobet, F., et al. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236-243.

14. Willingham, D. T. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105(3), 558-584.

15. Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12-19.

16. Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e48076.

17. Wise, R. A. (2004). Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 483-494.

18. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1-26.

19. Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. Carnegie Corporation of New York, Institute for Advanced Study, Commission on Mathematics and Science Education.

20. Klingberg, T., et al. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(2), 177-186.

21. Veenman, M. V., et al. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.

22. Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015). School readiness and self-regulation: A developmental psychobiological approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 711-731.

23. Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.